Your Legal Destination
The Doctrine of Promissory Estoppel cannot be invoked against the Union of India, if it takes a decision in a larger public interest- Supreme Court ruled.
Disciplinary proceedings should not be initiated against the Judicial Officer merely on the basis that a wrong order has been passed by him or his order found to be incorrect, unless there are serious allegations of Mis-conduct, extraneous influence or gratification of any kind- Supreme Court ruled.
The Supreme Court has referred the question of jurisdiction of Indian Court in entertaining application under section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act for challenging the Award passed in International Commercial Arbitration. The Court has referred various decisions of Supreme Court and referred the matter to Larger Bench.
Read the Judgment here
Arbitration-International - Indian Court jurisdiction
More Stories
The Apex Court on the Validity of Last Seen Theory and Forensic Evidence in Criminal Convictions
The Arbitral Tribunal has no jurisdiction to apply the principle of Liberal Construction in interpreting the terms of the Contract- SC Ruled
The Court is not bound to follow statute or rules of evidence while deciding the custody of a Child and the only consideration should be the welfare and well-being of the child- Supreme Court Reiterated