The Supreme Court has today delivered a Judgment by confirming the decision of the High Court in granting specific performance and held that the possibility of injury to the interest of a third party cannot be a ground for rejecting the relief of Specific Performance. The interest of a third party has to be tested in the circumstances of each and every case. The Court held that “The possibility of injury to the interest of third party does not, by itself, disentitle the plaintiff from specific performance but it depends upon the facts and circumstances of each case which will be considered by the court in the exercise of its discretion. The court may properly exercise discretion to decree specific performance, in any case where the plaintiff has done substantial acts or suffered losses in consequence of a contract capable of specific performance”.
The Supreme Court further reiterated that the relief of Specific Performance cannot be sought for as a matter of right.
Read the Judgment
Specific Performance- not a matter of right
More Stories
The Apex Court on the Validity of Last Seen Theory and Forensic Evidence in Criminal Convictions
The Arbitral Tribunal has no jurisdiction to apply the principle of Liberal Construction in interpreting the terms of the Contract- SC Ruled
The Court is not bound to follow statute or rules of evidence while deciding the custody of a Child and the only consideration should be the welfare and well-being of the child- Supreme Court Reiterated